Thanks for your plan. We are happy if the vote contributes to make you a better decision.
This topic is not for an implementation but for a feature. So, it is no matter if some implementation is adopted or how to be implemented. The matter of the vote is to know how much the feature is wanted.
Picking up my PR was only for showing the feature can be available immediately. Telling my opinion, it is not my concern that whose PR is adopted, but when the feature becomes accessible for users.
Of course, it is the designers' decision to chose either/both of an elegant full-set implementation after several years, or early minimal implementation. And, we'll appreciate the decision.
Even if the former was chosen, I want to access the feature as soon as possible, and the result of the vote shows more than a few users would expect so.
One of the current weak points of the Joplin project is that manpower of reviewers is insufficient and many PRs are left without reviews.
This idea would facilitate that new features are tried by many users, and their feedback could reduce reviewers' workload. Besides, such opportunities might motivate early adopters to become reviewers.