Actually I just looked again at one of the translations above (by Google Translate 
) and it has an opinion that starts:
Attorney Plutte's comment: What does the decision mean?
- The Munich judgment only applies to the popular Google Fonts service as an example. The principles established by the court apply to all web services originating in the USA. This does not just mean alternative offers such as Adobe Fonts or MyFonts , but literally every US service that is dynamically integrated into a website. (My emphasis)
EDIT: Removed some rubbish I wrote...