I've updated the snap store listing for Joplin with the 3.0 release. In particular, there's a new screenshot of the V3 interface as it appears in Ubuntu 24.04 ( I.E there's a trash folder ), and also ripped one of the graphics from Joplins website demonstrating the app sync and some prettier looking visual content, so there's now two images rather than one.
The text/description however has changed significantly. For the past 4 years it's been underplaying what Joplin can do; and as I looked upon it on the new Snap Store in Ubuntu 24.04, I thought it looked terribly small to the point of looking amateurish.
Adding the new screenshot made it look significantly better by itself; but herein lies my problem, how should a third party actually describe Joplin?
I've quickly drummed up some of the main features and emphasized sync, Joplin cloud, self hosting, plugins, etc. But in terms of tone and the like, how free are we really to express it?
(The review system was changed in Ubuntu 23.10, so the 54 "Very Good" reviews is nice progress to see organically!)
Personally I think that's a pretty good sales pitch, but I do note I go into the "App Store" type of writing at the end that could be seen as silly to some.
Ultimately I'm asking, does this look good to the project, and also, does it look good to the community. Is there something that could be added/changed/removed to make that stand out more
(P.S here I'm showing the Desktop apps view, but these changes are in the Web Store view too which I'd equally like to look good! - Install Joplin on Linux | Snap Store )