Kind of off topic, but Obsidian always seemed underpowered to me. I used both side by side for a year or so, but that was … some time ago.
My attraction to Joplin:
- Open source. This is a huge deal to me.
- End to end encrypted. I think obsidian does this now, though. But … not open source, so … the security is … who knows.
- Obsidian would struggle with large notes on the past. Joplin does not.
- To keep this response on point for this thread: Joplin is incredibly customizable with the full power of CSS at it's disposal. Obsidian's support for CSS is not just bad, it's awful. I heavily leverage this feature. Obsidian faceplants here and made it a no go for me.
- Joplin Cloud is awesome. I pay for it and it is worth every dime. I share stuff with people all of the time. I have not tried the notebook sharing feature, but that is really powerful.
- Where Obsidian shines: it's interface panel control is less awkward. It's knowledge graph stuff is easier to maintain, but … is not that complex to maintain in Joplin either. Obsidian’s canvas feature is cool. Other than that, Joplin is superior, IMHO. I can't really think where else Obsidian shines.
- Can obsidian use literally any external editor? Maybe. I don't know. But Joplin can.
- Oh. Here's a Joplin gripe: to spin up Joplin on another device is more complicated and errorprone than it should be. There. That's annoying.
- Back on topic: powerful CSS support. And Latex, and mermaid, and all those things. Joplin just wins in this regard and that's important to me.
- Laurent seems to be a nice guy. That's important too.






