# Web Clipper / Markdown plugins vs Pocket

**URL:** <https://discourse.joplinapp.org/t/web-clipper-markdown-plugins-vs-pocket/16715>\
**Category:** Lounge\
**Created:** [14 April 2021 02:13 UTC](https://discourse.joplinapp.org/t/web-clipper-markdown-plugins-vs-pocket/16715 "2021-04-14T02:13:03Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bre](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/discourse.joplinapp.org/bre/32/16423_2.png) [@bre](https://discourse.joplinapp.org/u/bre)\
**Post date:** [14 April 2021 02:13 UTC](https://discourse.joplinapp.org/t/web-clipper-markdown-plugins-vs-pocket/16715/1 "2021-04-14T02:13:03Z")

</div>

Is there a way to set-up either Joplin's own WebClipper or Markdown plugin to save the web sites looking nicely and conducive to reading later like the ones saved with the Pocket? Either of these plugins currently save a lot of unnecessary gibberish.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![CalebJohn](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/flex028/user_avatar/discourse.joplinapp.org/calebjohn/32/356_2.png) [@CalebJohn](https://discourse.joplinapp.org/u/CalebJohn)\
**Post date:** [14 April 2021 03:49 UTC](https://discourse.joplinapp.org/t/web-clipper-markdown-plugins-vs-pocket/16715/2 "2021-04-14T03:49:12Z")

</div>

The Joplin webclipper should do what you want by pressing "Clip Simplified page".